١٥٩ Recovery.—v. Prescription ("condictio indebiti")

١٦٠ Reduction. — V. Wakf (Reduction of term of lease).

١٦١ Reformatory school.—v. Cassation (Substantial nullity of judgment), 3°; Juvenile offenders.

١٦٢ Relief.—v. Lease (Rescission), 1°.

١٦٣ Renewal (Constructive).—v. Lease (Constructive renewal), Lease (Lessee, Holding over).

١٦٤ Renewal of lease, constructive.—Notice to quit given to a lessee fifteen days after the expiration of the term of the lease does not nullify its constructive renewal under art. 386 C.C. If such lease was for a term of one year, the lessee is liable, on its renewal, for a full year's rent. He cannot obtain any reduction by shewing that part of the land demised is his own property previously pledged to the lessor as security for payment of a debt, and that such debt was discharged before the determination of the new lease. (Trib. App. Tanta, 14 March, 1906; No. 92, p. 60.)

١٦٥ Rent (Arrears).—v. Lease (Rescission), 1°.

١٦٦ Renunciation.—v. Jurisdiction (Plea to—), 1°.

١٦٧ Re-opening prosecution.—v. Filing order by Parquet.

١٦٨ Repayment (Claim of—).—v. Prescription ("Condictio indebiti").

١٦٩ Rescission.—v. Lease (Concurrent ownership), (Rescission of—), Lease (Rescission).

١٧١ Retrospectivity of law.—1° A new rule of procedure will not apply to a suit begun before it came into operation where the result would be to extinguish the right of action. (App. 25 April 1905; No. 8, III, p. 3.)

١٧٢ 2°—v. Appeal (Admissibility), 3°.

١٧٣ Retrospectivity of procedure rules.—A new rule of procedure is not to be applied retrospectively if the result would be to extinguish a right of action which has been preserved conformably with the rules previously existing. (App. 25 April 1905; No. 18, II, p, 10.)

١٧٤ Revindication.—v. Claim (Value of—), Jurisdiction of Native Tribunals, 1°.

١٧٥ Revocation of judgment (Petition for—).—1° The right to petition for revocation of a judgment is barred by the lapse of 15 years. An order exempting the petitioner from the payment of the costs of the executory copy of the judgment which he seeks to set aside, does not interrupt the prescription. (App. 10 January 1906; No. 87, p. 58.)

١٧٦ 2° The Court will not grant a petition for revocation of a judgment based on the ground that one of the parties was personally guilty of fraud, unless it appears that in giving such judgment, it relied exclusively on the evidence resulting from the alleged fraud. (App. 5 April 1906; No. 98, p. 66.)

١٧٧ 3°—v. Sale (Rescission of—).

١٧٨ Right of way.—v. Easement.

١٧٩ Sale.—v. Lease (Rescission of—) 2°.

١٨٠ Sale (Contract of—).—v. Witnesses (Proof by—), 1°.

١٨١ Sale (Fictitious).—v. Usury.

١٨٢ Sale (Rescission).—Where, on default in payment of the purchase money, a purchaser is sued by his vendor to have the sale set aside, he may, even after judgment has been entered against him, but before such judgment has acquired the force of res judicata or has been affirmed on appeal, still prevent rescission by offering to pay. Even where the Court of Appeal has set aside the sale the purchaser's right revives if that Court subsequently grants a petition for the revocation of its judgment, the effect of such revocation being to restore to the parties the rights which they possessed before the revoked judgment was delivered. (App. 25 May 1905; No. 49, p. 33.) [entry runs from index p. 17 onto p. 18]

١٨٣ Sale (Successive).—v. Transcription (Bad faith).

١٨٤ Sale between ancestors and descendants.— v. Pre-emption, 3°.

١٨٥ Sale by order.—v. Garuka (Stay of execution).

١٨٦ Seal (Affixing of—).—v. Forgery, 1°.

١٨٧ Seal. (Denial of—).—v. Verification of documents.

١٨٨ Seal. (Denial of, Subsequent acknowledgment of—).—Where a party to a suit denies the seal of the instrument on which he is sued, but, subsequently, during the verification proceedings, admits its genuineness, he should, nevertheless, be ordered to pay the fine provided by art. 272 C.C.C.Pr. (Sum. Trib. Damanhour, 29 May 1906 No. 105, p. 68.)

١٨٩ Security (Forfeiture of—).—v. Bail, 1°, 2°.

١٩٠ Service of judgment on prisoner.—v. Opposition (Time for—).

١٩١ Servitude.—v. Easement.

١٩٢ Sham el Nassim.— v. Holidays (National and local.)

١٩٣ Ship (Loss of—).—v. Collision.

١٩٤ Signature (Absence of—).—v. Forgery, 2°.

١٩٥ Signature of judgment.—v. Cassation (Substantial nullity of procedure), 2°.

١٩٦ Sitting (Perjury committed in the—).—A conviction for perjury committed in the sitting is subject to the common law rules of procedure. The Court cannot, therefore, in passing sentence of imprisonment, order immediate execution and it must fix the sum for which bail will be taken. (Cir. No. 2, 23 January 1905; No. 47, p. 28.)

١٩٧ Sitting (Record of—).—v. Cassation (Substantial nullity of procedure), 3°, 4°; Trial in camera.

١٩٨ State representative.—v. Appeal (Admissibility), 1°. Appeal by the Parquet.

١٩٩ Stay of execution.—v. Execution (Provisional), Garuka (Stay of execution).