TRIBUNAL OF ASSIUT. (Judgment on Appeal.) 4 October 1919. MM. Abdel Wahab Fahmy Effendi (Pres.); Muhammad Tewfik Ibrahim Effendi, Abdel Lateef Ghorbal Effendi (JJ.). EGYPTIAN GOVERNMENT v. MUHAMMAD HASSANEIN EL SARAMEEGY. I. Petition for revocation of judgment—Fraud—Conditions II. Petition for revocation of judgment — Fraud — Nature of the fraud. (Art. 372 § 2, C.C.C.Pr.) I. A petition for the revocation of a judgment (requête civile) on the ground of fraud is inadmissible where it was not impossible for the petitioner, at the moment of the use of fraud, to discover the same. Thus, a petition by the Government for the revocation of judgment was held to be inadmissible, where it was based on the fraudulent production by the opposite party of a certificate of the Taklif which did not bear on the land in dispute, on the ground that the Taklif registers are kept under the control of the Government, and that the latter has, therefore, at its disposal the means necessary to discover the fraud. (1) II. In order to justify the revocation of a judgment by way of requête civile, fraud must be of such a nature as to have influenced the decision of the judges in the case. If the judgment was based on considerations other than fraud, the existence of fraud cannot be regarded as a ground for revoking the judgment. (2) (1) See, App., May 23, 1901 (Al Hocouc, 18, p. 58) ; App. Mixte, January 24, 1900 (B.L.J., XII, p. 96) ; Feb. 13, 1902 (B.L.J., XIV, p. 137). (2) App. Mixte, April 4, 1894 (B.L.J., VI, p. 219) ; April 4, 1895, (B.L.J , VII, p 215) ; Nov. 29, 1899 (B.L.J., XII, p. 29) ; April 4, 1901 (B.L.J., XIII, p. 236).